Exploring the Scope of EcoFactor v. Google

Includes a Live Web Event on 04/15/2026 at 1:00 PM (EDT)

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s May decision in EcoFactor v. Google has been widely recognized for its discussion of district courts’ gatekeeping role under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert, especially in relation to expert testimony regarding patent damages. This webinar will examine the potential impact of EcoFactor in relation to issues the en banc court did not specifically address, such as apportionment.

Paul Berghoff

Founder

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Paul Berghoff, founder of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert Berghoff LLP, has three decades of experience as lead trial counsel in complex patent litigation – both jury and bench trials and PTAB proceedings – concentrating in litigation involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, biotechnology, electronics, and software. He has successfully tried scores of patent cases and has successfully argued dozens of times before the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He services as Chair of the firm’s Litigation & Appeals Practice Group. He is Vice-Chair of IPO’s Amicus Brief Committee.

Brian Horne

Partner

Knobbe Martens

Brian Horne is an experienced trial lawyer who litigates throughout the country for both plaintiffs and defendants. Mr. Horne’s cases involve a variety of industries, and he has won trials involving a wide range of disputes, including patent, trade secret, trademark, trade dress, and breach of contract. He is the Managing Partner of Knobbe's Los Angeles office.

Jason Liss

Special Counsel

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

Jason Liss’ practice focuses on intellectual property matters at the agency, trial and appellate levels. He has represented clients in patent disputes involving a wide variety of subject matter areas, including computer hardware, software and networking; semiconductor design and manufacture; wireless and cellular communication standards; medical devices; and pharmaceuticals. His practice encompasses all facets of litigation, including pre-suit investigations, pleadings, fact and expert discovery, alternative dispute resolution, trial and appeal. He has experience with district court trials before both bench and jury, Federal Circuit appeals, International Trade Commission investigations, and Patent Trial and Appeal Board inter partes review proceedings, and particularly extensive experience regarding patent infringement damages. Additionally, he has presented Continuing Legal Education and internal trainings on a variety of topics, including International Trade Commission investigations, fact and expert discovery in district court litigation, and patent infringement damages.

Key:

Complete
Failed
Available
Locked
Exploring the Scope of EcoFactor v. Google
04/15/2026 at 1:00 PM (EDT)  |  60 minutes
04/15/2026 at 1:00 PM (EDT)  |  60 minutes
Evaluation Survey
11 Questions
CLE Credit
4 Questions
4 Questions CLE credit will be available for registered attendees only. If you would like CLE credit for this webinar, please complete the following questions. IPO will apply for CLE for all live programs in the majority of the states that require CLE. IPO will not be applying for CLE in the states of Florida, South Carolina, West Virginia, or Texas (attorneys in TX may submit up to 5 hours of self-study credit). Once IPO has received approval from the state(s) CLE boards , certificate(s) of attendance will be available for download from your dashboard.