Patent Case Law Year in Review (RECORDING)

This webinar will provide a roundup of this year’s most significant patent cases. Over the past year, the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have authored a number of opinions re-shaping patent law, including Helsinn v. Teva, Return Mail v. US Postal Service, and numerous others involving issues such as UPSTO inter partes review decisions and patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Our panelists, both vice-chairs of IPO's Amicus Brief Committee, will provide key takeaways from these decisions and comment on patent cases to watch in the coming year.


Paul Berghoff (McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert Berghoff, LLP)

Gregory Castanias (Jones Day)


Samantha Aguayo (Intellectual Property Owners Association)

Paul Berghoff

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Paul Berghoff, founder of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbtert  Berghoff LLP, has three decades of experience as lead trial counsel in complex patent litigation – both jury and bench trials and PTAB proceedings – concentrating in litigation involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, biotechnology, electronics, and software. He has successfully tried scores of patent cases and has successfully argued dozens of times before he US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He services as Chair of the firm’s Litigation & Appeals Practice Group.  He is Vice-Chair of IPO’s Amicus Brief Committee.

Gregory Castanias

Jones Day

Greg Castanias is a partner at Jones Day in Washington, DC. He is head of the firm’s Federal Circuit team and has almost 30 years’ experience as a leading appellate and intellectual property litigator. His experience includes five US Supreme Court arguments, 70+ Federal Circuit arguments, and countless others in federal and state courts across the nation, from Alaska to Connecticut. His intellectual property experience includes such diverse technologies as genetics, diagnostics, pharmaceuticals, chemistry, electronics, and mechanical fields, as well as copyright, trademark, and trade secret disputes. He is Vice-Chair of IPO’s Amicus Brief Committee.


Patent Case Law Year in Review (RECORDING)
Open to view video.
Open to view video.
Evaluation Survey
10 Questions
CLE Credit
4 Questions
4 Questions CLE credit will be available for registered attendees only. If you would like CLE credit for this webinar, please complete the following questions. IPO will apply for CLE for all live programs in the majority of the states that require CLE. IPO will not be applying for CLE in the states of Florida, Ohio, South Carolina, West Virginia, or Texas (attorneys in TX may submit up to 5 hours of self-study credit). Once IPO has received approval from the state(s) CLE boards , certificate(s) of attendance will be available for download from your dashboard.
VA Certificate of Attendance
Up to 1.00 CLE credits available  |  Certificate available
Up to 1.00 CLE credits available  |  Certificate available Virginia has approved this recording for 1 hour of CLE credit. Only registered attendees that viewed the on-demand program are eligible to claim credit. To claim your credit, select the “claim credits” and then “view/print your certificate” for your records.